![]() |
October/November 2003 |
| Technical Focus | |
|
Fig.
1. Location map for the East Java HDMC3D survey. The survey is designed
to cover several prospective leads identified on earlier 2D data. Fig.
2. Compared to existing 2D data (upper figure), the new HDMC3D data
(lower figure) yields a significant improvement in resolution. On this
25 km data extract, steeply-dipping Kujung carbonate reef flanks are
crisply imaged, testament to the virtue of very tight 3D spatial sampling
during acquisition. As indicated by the arrows, steep dip imaging is
improved on the new HDMC3D data. Fig.
3. Time slice from the East Java HDMC3D survey at 0.15 s TWT. Resolution
of the complex meandering channel system is excellent. Horizontal scale
=15 km. Fig.
4. Time slice from the East Java HDMC3D survey at 1.0 s TWT. The Kujung
carbonate features are highly complex in distribution, demanding a high
resolution 3D seismic acquisition and processing strategy. Refer also
to Figure 5. Fig.
5. 3D perspective plot from the holoSeisTM immersive visualisation and
interpretation system. The Top Kujung I surface interpreted here (~
1.0 s TWT) reveals the density and complex distribution of carbonates
throughout the HDMC3D survey area. |
The
Resolution Revolution Introduction Use of Ramform vessel technology allowed a very high streamer count to be towed at close separation, and with outstanding efficiency. Average daily production throughout the entire survey was in excess of 50 km2. If all mobilisation, weather, obstruction, and logistical downtime are accounted for, effective production was still in excess of 35 km2 per day (e.g. less than three months to complete 3000 km2). Interpretation
Objectives It was clear prior to acquisition of new 3D seismic data that a special emphasis upon the resolution of highly-variable, steeply-dipping (in excess of 60°) features was required. Survey
Parameterisation and Results The high signal-to-noise quality and excellent resolution of the East Java HDMC3D data is testament to the virtues of tight 3D spatial sampling, and the HD3D acquisition method. The new HDMC3D seismic data has revealed the presence of numerous, often complex prospects on both the upper and lower Kujung levels, as well as on the deeper Basement/Ngimbang levels. Migration pathways can thus be interpreted, and detailed prospectivity analysis is possible. A common frustration with 3D acquisition is that high-quality resolution observed on existing 2D data is not observed at a comparable standard on new 3D data. Ideally, we desire the 3D structural imaging power of the 3D method, combined with high resolution in all directions. As conventional 3D acquisition typically samples four to six times more finely in the shooting (inline) direction, resolution is compromised in the cross-line direction. In Figure 2, previous 2D data (acquired by PGS in 2002) is compared to the new HDMC3D data acquired in 2003. Resolution is actually significantly improved in the new HDMC3D data, demonstrating how 3D pre-stack migration benefits from tightly sampled 3D data being input, free of aliasing. Figure 3 presents a migrated time slice at 0.15 s TWT. Note the almost total absence of any acquisition footprint, even at such a shallow depth. The resolution and definition of complex meandering channels systems is quite startling, testament to the resolution power of the HD3D acquisition method in dual-source shooting mode. Figure 4 presents a deeper time slice (1.0 s TWT), intersecting the Kujung carbonate features. Again, resolution is excellent, evidenced also in the interpreted 3D surface plotted in Figure 5. Frequency analysis indicates primary event frequencies in excess of 80 Hz throughout the target region, before any Q compensation or spectral whitening. Conclusions Acknowledgements References |