June/July 2003
Technical Focus

Back to Contents

 

Fig. 14. Sketch of a recumbent slump fold, adapted from Reading (1986). Note that the down slope dip is opposite to that of the fold limbs.
Click to enlarge

Fig. 15. Example of a dip stereoplot (upper hemisphere projection) displaying typical deep marine feature classified sedimentary dips.Fig. 16. Example of the construction of an azimuthal vector walkout plot using dip azimuth data.
Click to enlarge

Fig. 16. Example of the construction of an azimuthal vector walkout plot using dip azimuth data.
Click to enlarge

Fig. 17. Example of an optimum televiewer image resolving thin (3-6 cm) sandstone beds and lenses for net sand determination, from Lawrence (2002).

Fig. 18. Interpreted geological relationships through one sand body imaged three times by a RAB tool.
Click to enlarge

Fig. 19. Illustration of the application of bed top and base dip geometry to calculate distance to bed feather edge.
Click to enlarge

Fig. 20. Illustration of the thinning rate differences between channel sands and sheet sands.
Click to enlarge

Finding Yourself In Deep Water (Part II)
Lawrence Bourke & Roddy McGarva
Task Geoscience, February 2003

Introduction
Part I of this article was featured in Technical Focus, in the April/May issue. It reviewed the types of borehole image tools and the styles of geological features which can be resolved in deepwater sediments. The general approach to interpretation was outlined and considered in the context of the major depositional environments which can be found in a deep marine setting. Part II considers the types of directional data and thin bed information which can be resolved from images. The important geological contributions of LWD image logs in deepwater sediments are reviewed and emerging reservoir modelling applications are considered.

Sediment Dispersal Inferences in Deep Marine Sediments
The determination of sediment dispersal and transport directions using borehole image logs and dipmeters is a well-recognised application. Interpretation of transport direction from most deep marine sedimentary environments is challenging. This is because deep marine sediments do not tend to produce significant datasets of classical current indicators, such as traction current features. One of the more reliable outcrop indicators of sediment dispersal in turbidites would be the orientation of flute, sole and tool marks. These are usually too small to resolve on images and, in any case, are typically measured from the plan-surface or base of beds.

One of the most reliable indicators of local slope orientation is the measurement of slumped beds. These are typically large enough for accurate dip measurement from one or several fold limbs (Figure 14). However, comparisons between slumps seen on images, and regional palaeoslope orientations determined from high resolution 3D seismic, reveals that the local slump direction does not necessarily relate to regional slope. It is, however, quite common for slumps to be oriented with the axis of a channel, as in Figure 15. However, slump trends orthogonal to channel complex axes are also commonly seen. Such bedding orientation inferences must be analysed in the context of the local conceptual depositional model.

Another fruitful source of more subtle sediment dispersal indicators comes from the naturally low angle bedding occurring in deep marine sediments. As in the example presented in Figure 15, structural dip is determined from thick claystone intervals, assumed to represent the palaeo-horizontal. Once structural dip has been rotated back to horizontal, any low angle residual dip in well-bedded sequences may represent lateral accretion on subtle topographic features, such as erosion surfaces, slump scars or channel levees. Alternatively, subtle dip trends may reflect differential compaction between individual sedimentary bodies, however, such features tend also to exhibit other vertical dip magnitude trends. A useful method for the identification of subtle dip changes in shallow dipping sediments is the vector walkout plot. Such plots are generated by cumulatively adding orientation vector data, usually either azimuth or inclination (Figure 16). These plots are generated by the head-to-tail stacking of unit vectors sequentially up through a given succession. Each azimuth is drawn from the population of derived dip data. They provide a visual running average of mean azimuth for a studied succession. Sharp deviations in azimuth direction recognised from these plots can sometimes flag significant stratigraphic breaks.

In the analysis of over 100 turbidite successions we have found that borehole images and dipmeters usually yield well-defined and preferred orientation fabrics for a range of depositional surfaces. A large proportion shows two distinct modes set at right angles to one another, with one mode indicating palaeostrike and the other aligning to down slope channel axis. However, in some circumstances it is possible to detect these aligned bedding fabrics, but it can be difficult to assign which is down slope and which is slope normal.

Analysis of Thin Beds Using Image Data
Thin-bedded sandstone facies can dominate successions in distal settings within many of the deep marine environments discussed above. These thin bedded sequences can represent significant oil-in-place as a producible reservoir rock, or significant upside to a more conventional, amalgamated, stacked, deep marine, reservoir sequence.

But what do we mean by thin beds? In the log analysis sense, thin beds are individual beds that cannot be individually resolved by conventional open hole resistivity logs. The effect of this log resolution limitation, quoted in literature, ranges from 10-30% underestimation in net to gross. It is being increasingly recognised that borehole images can provide a basis for extending net sand calculation well beyond the resolution of conventional wireline logs. Lawrence (2002) illustrates that even an acoustic televiewer, logged in good hole conditions in moderately consolidated sediments, can provide sufficient acoustic bedding contrast to extract sandstone bedding data for detailed net to gross studies (Figure 17).

Net sand information derived from borehole images can also be used as the basis for bed thickness statistical analysis, which can be a powerful tool in the study of many deep marine sequences.

While beyond the scope of this article, there is a growing school of log analysis that uses the high resolution of borehole image logs to generate a square bed 'earth model' of the thin sandstone and mudstone units in a stacked sequence. This earth model is used to convolve conventional resistivity logs, correct for shoulder bed effects and derive a more representative solution for bed saturation at bed boundaries. The bed model can also be used to generate synthetic resistivity logs, forward modelled using tool response equations.

Applications of LWD Images
In recent years LWD imaging devices have been introduced into routine service. These devices rely on resistivity and density contrasts of the formation to produce image maps of a borehole wall during drilling. Resulting images can be transmitted in real time to the surface, providing a picture of the well bore almost directly behind the bit. Most commonly, these images have been acquired in horizontal or highly deviated wells, providing quality geological images from turbidite reservoir sections that resemble long, but thin, quarry sections.

Our experiences in the interpretation of LWD images has shown that the immediate impact on geological description is in fine scale structural evaluation. Most of our studies find that the notion of uniform structural tilt, usually defined from near vertical well sections, is wrong. Sections are commonly found to be very gently folded, with fold amplitudes of 2 to 10 m associated with wavelengths of 100 m to 500 m. Many of these folds are not detected on seismic. Fluid drainage within thin reservoir sand bodies may become an issue in such circumstances. LWD images have also proved valuable in fault and fracture detection, and the passage of a horizontal well through a fault damage zone allows estimates to be made of fault throw.

A major advantage of horizontal wells through channelised turbiditic sections is the ability to repeatedly intersect a channel margin (Figure 18). From such data, each surface of intersection can be orientated and their position and strike used to constrain channel margin directions (McGarva et al, 1999). If a large number of channel margin contacts have been sampled and orientated within a channel complex, it is possible to statistically model likely height-width ratios for the sampled channel sand bodies.

Horizontal wells are commonly drilled with the intention to run parallel or near parallel to one particular bed for substantial distances. In addition, the passage of horizontal wells through a gently folded succession allows a sedimentologist to trace lateral variations in lithology and facies type across a field for a given bed. Both of these situations allow horizontal changes in sandbody architecture and facies type to be assessed. For instance, we have observed rapid lateral facies changes from well-constrained, clean and visually massive sheeted sandstones to more argillaceous and well-bedded sections over distances less than 220 m. In contrast, other instances showed very little internal change within correlated channel elements displaying progressive abandonment.

Reservoir Modelling Using Image and Log Data
A holy grail of borehole image interpretation would be to provide an unambiguous answer to depositional environment, sand body shape, orientation and geometry. For the immediate future this is unlikely to occur, although images can help in partly answering some of these questions. The approach adopted is a synthesis of geometry and statistics and can yield data on sand body volumes, likely channel shape and bed continuity.

Images and core allow detailed vertical sections of facies data to be derived, often over hundreds of metres. This data is depth-based and can generate very detailed bed thickness information. Is it possible to derive likely sand bed dimensions within a basin using thickness data? The short answer is no (Malinverno, 1997), unless we have prior knowledge of the shape of the deposits (Luthi, 2001) when a scaling relationship can be derived. Derived values of reservoir volumes depend strongly on the assumed shape of the deposits.

Possession of orientation data for the top and base of individual turbidite beds allows the extension of these bedding planes into the surrounding formation. For suitable bed tops and bases it is possible to determine where these beds will thin to a feather-edge, and the strike of the intersection (Figure 19). Calculated thinning rates are a proxy for bed continuity. Although bedding surfaces are rarely exactly planar, this technique allows relative estimates of thinning rates to be made between different sections.

A further larger-scale approach to bed thinning rates can be made from wells and proximal sidetracks. Individual beds, bed packages and layers are traced between wells. A numerical thinning rate is then calculated for these sections. We have found that basin floor sheet sandstones have different thinning rates compared to channel fill successions and have successfully discriminated between the two where seismic data is very poor (Figure 20).

Examination of a series of LWD images from horizontal wells within a turbiditic field showed a dominance of oversteep sandstone-shale contacts. These were originally interpreted as faulted and/or erosive margins. However, analysis of channel element geometries using ellipses as a model indicates that vertical wells into typical sandstone bodies will tend to underestimate mean dips, whilst horizontal wells will overestimate mean dips. Horizontal wells preferentially cut the oversteep parts of the sandstone-shale contact and this results in an overestimate of mean contact dip. It is not because the dips are steep by deformation (e.g. faulting), they are steep by default of a sampling bias. Results from the modelling replicate the general form of the data sets from wells. The inverse problem, given the mean dip, what is the geometry of a typical sandstone body, has also been considered and has been used to estimate thickness:width ratio for sandstone channel bodies, and the likely shape and extent of carbonate nodules.

Borehole images deliver spatial content to a reservoir description. The development of new methodologies and techniques will give us the ability to fully use this detail in future reservoir models.

Conclusions
Borehole images can provide an important scale-bridge between core and seismic scale datasets. Recent advances in microresistivity image logs allow high resolution image data to be gather from oil-based mud, and work almost as well as in conductive water based mud systems.

Image logs will, in most situations, provide key sedimentary detail to enhance understanding of the reservoir and associated sequences. High-resolution images are particularly useful as a source for sedimentary descriptive data from deep marine sedimentary systems. However, a systematic approach to interpretation is essential.

While accurate, feature classified dip information can be acquired from deep water sediments, the interpretation of sediment dispersal directions in such sequences can be challenging and must be conducted in the context of a conceptual depositional model. LWD logs, while of lower resolution, are becoming a recognised source of lateral data regarding the length and width of facies tracts and the nature of lateral contacts. This is an exiting new area of image log application with much potential for the future.

These image logs can also be used to provide accurate bedding statistics, which can be used to generate useful thickness trend statistics, and are being increasingly used for other forms of bed modelling and advanced log analysis techniques.

Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Dr John Millington of Shell Expro who provided some of the pictures and classifications used herein.

References
ADAMS, J., BOURKE, L, and BUCK, S. 1990. Integrating Formation MicroScanner images with core. Schlumberger Oilfield Review, 2, 52–65.
BOURKE, L. T., 1989. Recognizing artifact images of the Formation Microscanner. Paper WW, in 30th annual logging symposium transactions. Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, 25.
BOURKE, L. T., 1992. Sedimentological borehole image analysis in clastic rocks - a systematic approach to interpretation. In: HURST, A., GRIFFITHS, C. M., and WORTHINGTON, P. F. (eds.), Geological applications of Wireline Logs II. Geological Society, Special Publication No. 65, 31–4.
CLARK, J. D. and PICKERING, K. T., 1996. Submarine Channels Processes and Architecture. Vallis Press, Oxford, p231.
HARKER, S. D., McGANN, G. J., BOURKE, L. T., and ADAMS, J. T., 1990. Methodology of Formation MicroScanner image interpretation in Claymore and Scapa fields (North Sea). In: HURST, A., LOVELL, M. A., and MORTON, A. C., (eds.), Geological Applications of Wireline Logs, Geological Society of London Special Publication No. 48, 11–25.
LAWRENCE, D., 2002. Net sand analysis in thinly bedded turbidite reservoirs – case study integrating acoustic images, dipmeters and core data. SPWLA 43rd Annual Logging Symposium, June 2002.
LOFTS, J. C., BEDFORD, J., BOULTON, H., VAN DOORN, J. A. and JEFFREYS, P., 1997. Feature recognition and the interpretation of images acquired from horizontal wellbores. In: LOVELL, M. A. and HARVEY, P. (eds.) Developments in Petrophysics, Geological Society Special Publication, 122, 345–365.
LOFTS, J. C. and BOURKE, T., 1999. The recognition of artefacts from acoustic and resistivity borehole devicres. In: LOVELL, M. A., WILLIAMSON, G and HARVEY, P. K. (eds.) Borehole Imaging: Applications and Case Histories. Geological Society Special Publication No. 159, 59–76.
LUTHI, S. M., 2001. Geological Well Logs. Springer, Berlin, p373.
MALINVERNO, A., 1997. On the power law distribution of turbidite beds. Basin Research, 9, 263–274.
McGARVA, R. M., BELL, C. and BEDFORD, J., 1999. Use of Resistivity At Bit images within an Eocene submarine channel complex, Alba Field, UKCS. In: LOVELL, M. A., WILLIAMSON, G and HARVEY, P. K. (eds.) Borehole Imaging: Applications and Case Histories. Geological Society Special Publication No. 159, 177–189.
MILLINGTON, J. and CLARK, J. D., 1995. Submarine canyon and associated base-of-slope sheet system: the Eocene Charo-Arro system south-east Pyrenees, Spain. In: PICKERING, K. T., HISCOTT, R. N., RICCI LUCCHI, N, H. and SMITH, R. D. A. (eds.). Atlas of Deep Water Environments: Architectural Style in Turbidite Systems, 150–156, Chapman and Hall, London.
READING, H. G (ed.)., 1986. Sedimentary environments and facies. Second Edition. Blackwell Science, Oxford, p615.
READING, H. G and RICHARDS, M., 1994. Turbidite systems in deep-water basin margins classified by grain size and feeder system. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 78, 792–822.
STOW, D. A. V., 1985. Deep-sea clastics: where are we and where are we going. In: BRENCHLEY, P. J. and WILLIAMS, B. P. J. (eds.) Sedimentology recent developments and applied aspects. Blackwell, 67–93.
SURLYK, F. 1978. A submarine fan sedimentation along fault scarps on tilted fault blocks (Jurassic-Cretaceous boundary. Bulletin Grønlands geol. Unders., 128, 1–108.


For further technical articles on the interpretation of borehole image data, visit the Task website on www.taskgeoscience.com

Back to top