![]() |
Aug/Sept 2001 |
|
Branch News |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PESA
NSW Field Trip The day began with the attendees meeting at the Central Railway bus terminal where we boarded a bus for the trip to Camden. We were joined there by a few Sydney people who had traveled by car, as well as a contingent from AGSO in Canberra. Mr Charles M Wright, Manager Corporate and Government Affairs of Sydney Gas Company, welcomed us. He introduced Mr Mike Roy Operations Manager who was formerly with Schlumberger Oilfield Services. He described the various completions that had been tried and the varying degrees of success. Sydney Gas holds PELs 2, 4 and 267 in the Sydney Basin. The current work is being undertaken on an Assessment Lease where a pilot project, including production facilities and pipeline to the AGL Distribution System, is being completed. The gas treatment facility was 80% complete when PESA visited the plant. From the days of Australian Oil and Gas (AOG's) exploration work in the Camden area in the 1950s and early 1960s, attempts to produce the gas of this area have met with little success. Typically, in those early days, there would be a major flow of gas when the prospective horizon was reached but within a day this would dwindle to near nothing. By comparison with what is being done today, AOG had little hope of success with only the technology of 1950/60 era at their disposal. AMOCO in the 1980s did a lot of excellent work in the area but did not proceed because of more attractive exploration targets in other countries. Now that Sydney Gas has taken up the area, and with the data and knowledge gained from previous operators such as AMOCO, AGL and AOG, and staff with Coal Bed Methane experience from the USA and elsewhere to guide them, they have had quite encouraging results. The primary target is the Bulli Seam which has a low water content. The secondary one is the Tongara Seam some 100 m further below. The evolution of well completions is shown in Figure 1 and described below.
Fig. 1. Open
Hole Completions: Cased
Hole Completions: Proposed
Horizontal Completions: During this evolution in completions, various combinations of drilling fluids, fraccing procedures and injection fluids have been used until the present scheme was devised. The details of this will be the subject of a paper currently in preparation. Environmental
considerations Disposal of the produced water has not been a problem as it is quite fresh and certainly potable to stock. It is certainly far more pleasant to taste than the waters from the Great Artesian Basin of Queensland. Consequently, the water is either run into farm dams or released onto the ground to irrigate crops, with the prior consent of the property owner. Drilling mud pits are dug and lined with plastic. When finished with, the pits are cleaned out, the plastic removed and the topsoil graded back over the hole. Thus the ground is restored to its original contours. From the Camden headquarters we moved to the pilot gas plant and treatment facility. Figure
3 shows the attendees being addressed at the then nearly completed pilot
gas plant. In the background is a large butane gas cylinder. Butane is
added as required to increase the calorific value of the gas so that it
meets the specifications of the local distribution system, notwithstanding
that gas being produced is pipeline quality. Also shown is a dam which
was formerly used in conjunction with drilling the nearby Figure 4 shows the now completed pilot gas plant, which is in operation. Figure 5 is of the gas plant flare pipe ready for initial use. Figure 6 shows Mr Charles Wright beside a nearby completed well and shows all that will normally remain on the land after a well has been completed and placed on line.
From the gas plant we traveled to a newly completed well to demonstrate the ease with which the wells unload water. Figure 7 shows Mr Ken Bull, Field Superintendent, with his hand on the well head separator for the newly completed Logan Brae #5 well. Also shown is the pipeline leading to the water storage pit. Figure 8 shows Logan Brae #5 unloading water under its own head of pressure. We then moved on to a well that was being prepared for cementing. Figure 9 shows the truck mounted workover rig, trailers of cementing fluids, and pumping truck in place for the cementing job on the Logan Brae #9 well. Figure 10 shows Mr Ken Bull, Field Superintendent, addressing attendees at the Logan Brae #9 well. The cementing truck is in the background and various pieces of equipment in are the foreground. This concluded the visit to the Sydney Gas field operations after a most informative time. We then adjourned to a nearby hotel for drinks and lunch before progressing on to the Appin Power Plant.
Appin
Power Plant The generating plant comprises 54 gas engine generator sets, each of 1MW nominal rating. Figure 11 shows part of one bank with eight gas engine generator sets. Reciprocating gas engines were selected for this project due to their ability to use low pressure gas with low methane content. Generation voltage is 415 volts. Voltage is increased to 22 kV by unit transformers (one transformer per two generator sets). A high voltage substation is installed to further increase voltage to 66 kV. Interconnection with the utility network is at 66 kV. The project is wholly owned and operated by Energy Developments. The power is supplied to Integral Energy, the local electricity distribution utility. It has a power generation capacity of 56 MW. Another similar plant operates in conjunction with the BHP Group's Tower Hill Coal Mine, NSW. It has a power generation capacity of 41 MW. Energy Developments' plants utilise landfill gas at a number of locations to produce electricity. These include: 1.
Belrose (Sydney) NSW (power generation capacity 4 MW) Though all of these plants have far lower capacity than the Appin or Tower Hill plants, they drain methane which would otherwise escape to the atmosphere, and produce electricity. This all helps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and produces electricity with less thermal release than the burning of coal. Sadly we were told that today it would be uneconomic to build similar plants because of the reduction in the price for electricity resulting from the deregulated market. The author wishes to thank the staff of Sydney Gas, particularly Will Barker, geologist, for reviewing this paper and making various corrections. |